
By SHAYLA ESCUDERO/Lincoln Chronicle
NEWPORT – About 150 people crowded the Performing Arts Center on Tuesday evening to listen to Newport’s first state of the city presentation.
City council members took turns reading a speech that highlighted Newport’s art programs, street improvements, cultural outreach efforts, challenges and aspirations – and took a moment to plug the $38 million infrastructure bond request on the Nov. 3 ballot.
“I have served on the Newport City Council for nearly five years, three of them as mayor,” said Mayor Jan Kaplan. “During that time, there is one image of our city that I always carry with me.

“More than 800 people converged on City Hall after the sudden removal of our Coast Guard helicopter, and amid the possibility of a federal detention center that could be built at our municipal airport. I saw a community come together and stand up for itself; a community prepared to do what was necessary to protect our people, our economy, our values, and our way of life.”
That moment reminded Kaplan why he chose to live in Newport, he told the Tuesday crowd, many who were standing to fit in the full room. Notable attendees included Sen. Dick Anderson, R-Lincoln City, Rep. David Gomberg, D-Otis, Philomath Mayor Chris McMorran and Port of Newport executive director Paula Miranda.
People may define Newport by its picturesque attributes, the Yaquina Bay Bridge, fishing boats at the harbor and tidepools, Kaplan said.
“Those are important parts of who we are, but Newport is more than a beautiful place,” Kaplan said. “We’re a working waterfront. We’re a center of science, education, healthcare, fishing, tourism, the arts, and public service.”
Councilors listed accomplishments – the completion of road and sidewalk projects, efforts to champion public art and the unseen work of city staff to keep services such as the library running.
They also listed off challenges – the city’s housing shortage, the efforts to fix the Big Creek dams and outdated infrastructure that needs replacing.
Councilors also took the opportunity to mention the infrastructure replacement bond in the November general election.
“The city can invest $38 million into critical infrastructure projects to protect coastal and natural environments, secure safe and reliable drinking water, enhance accessibility and safety, and improve parks, streets, and other infrastructure,” said Councilor CM Hall.
The close timing of the state of the city address with the upcoming election – both the bond and council and mayoral races – was not intentional, Kaplan told the Lincoln Chronicle.

The city council had floated the idea and decided in January to include the state of the city address as part of the year’s council goals and hope to present each year. The event aligns with their efforts to conduct more community engagement, Kaplan said.
Each council member that spoke at the event – Kaplan, Hall, Robert Emond, Angel Apracio-Reyes, and Sandy Roumagoux are running in the November election. Councilors Cynthia Jacobi and Steven Hickman whose seats are not up for re-election did not speak.
Every councilor was given a chance to participate in the speech and spoke voluntarily, Kaplan told the Chronicle.
Kaplan ended the address with an acknowledgement to former county commissioner Claire Hall’s work to address homelessness and the importance of community engagement.
“Local government works best when community members do not see city hall as a distant institution, but a place where their participation matters …” Kaplan said. “We can debate difficult decisions while respecting one another and remembering that we share the same streets, the same water, the same harbor, and the same future.”
- Shayla Escudero is an enterprise reporter for the Lincoln Chronicle covering local governments, education, housing and social services and can be reached at [email protected]










So none of the town residents and/or taxpayers were given time to comment or ask questions? Was a detailed breakdown of the $38 millon bond the city gov’t wants voters to approve? If not, then Mr. Kaplan’s statement re: community not perceiving the city gov’t as “distant” but where their participation matters, well, not at that meeting. The amount of comment time allowed MOP at city counicl meetings & even if they get to comment, has been signficantly shortened & the city terminated all citizen committees, maybe 2 years ago? Stated it was too expensive and it was too difficult for too many of the committees to get the required quorum at meetings. Maybe the latter was so, yet all of that’s decreased participtation of residents–residents were free to request assistance from on issues that concerned them (if it fell w/in the committees’ responsibilities.
FYI, there are eight active citizen committees. I know because I’m on one of them and we ALWAYS have a quorum. They were not all terminated two years ago. Go to the city’s website and apply for a committee. The more voices the better.
Hi SH – I wanted to address some of your questions:
So none of the town residents and/or taxpayers were given time to comment or ask questions? – this is not customary at State of the City (or State of the Union, State of the State, etc…) addresses. However, an hour-long reception followed where City staff, Mayor, and City Councilors were all available to speak with community members and answer any questions, and the majority of attendees did just that.
Was a detailed breakdown of the $38 millon bond the city gov’t wants voters to approve? – a detailed breakdown has been available for months. Information can be found at NewportOregon.gov/Bond2026 – including an FAQ, a full timeline with videos as to how the bond was arrived at, and a detailed listing of projects included.
The amount of comment time allowed MOP at city counicl meetings & even if they get to comment, has been signficantly shortened – our public comment time is 3 minutes per person. We also have two public comment sessions at our City Council meetings. The session is normally limited to 15 minutes, but Council has often allowed that to go over to allow an opportunity for community members to be heard. We have not shortened or changed this process.
& the city terminated all citizen committees, maybe 2 years ago? – the City sunset and restructured a few committees two years ago for a number of reasons. In one case, the Arts Advisory Committee was shifted to the Oregon Coast Council of the Arts, which is better equipped to oversee such a committee. We currently have eight citizen committees and always encourage community members to apply to serve on them if interested.
Of the eight committees noted above and listed on the city website, two are provided for under state law (budget committee and planning commission), one is comprised entirely of council members (urban renewal agency), one oversees administration of the city’s employee retirement plan (retirement board of trustees), and one promotes cultural exchange programs and community events (sister city committee). The three remaining committees are the library advisory committee, parking advisory committee, and parks and recreation advisory committee.
Where is the detail on the website? All I could find was a general statement that said the money would be spent on: Water system resiliency
Wastewater infrastructure
Transportation and pedestrian safety and accessibility
Community park enhancements
City facilities
https://www.newportoregon.gov/bond2026/projects.php