Sen. Brian Boquist, I-Dallas, prevailed in a First Amendment lawsuit he filed against other senators after he was punished for comments he made.
By BEN BOTKIN/Oregon Capital Chronicle
SALEM — Sen. Brian Boquist, the maverick Oregon lawmaker who said state police should “send bachelors and come heavily armed” if they wanted to drag him back to the Capitol in a 2019 Republican-led Senate walkout, has prevailed in a First Amendment federal lawsuit tied to that statement and others.
In a Monday ruling, U.S. District Judge Michael McShane found that the Senate Conduct Committee retaliated against Boquist, I-Dallas, and violated his First Amendment rights when it required him to give a 12-hour notice prior to entering the Capitol. The conduct committee’s action followed Boquist’s statement to a television reporter about the state police and a separate comment on the Senate floor to then-Senate President Peter Courtney: “If you send the state police to get me, hell’s coming to visit you personally.”
In response, Boquist filed a federal lawsuit in 2019 against Courtney and conduct committee members Floyd Prozanski and James Manning, both Eugene Democrats. Prozanski is still the committee’s chair.
McShane rejected arguments from state Department of Justice attorneys representing the three Democrats that the 12-hour notice was necessary because Boquist was deemed a threat.
“Because the 12-hour notice rule served no legitimate purpose other than to retaliate against (Boquist) after he engaged in protected speech, defendants’ actions violated plaintiff’s First Amendment rights to free speech and association,” McShane wrote in his ruling.
The committee lifted the 12-hour notice requirement last November, with Prozanski saying it was no longer needed to provide a safe workplace.
McShane’s ruling marks the potential end of a legal saga that began when Boquist first filed the lawsuit without an attorney. The defendants have 30 days to decide whether to appeal the case. Courtney, a Salem Democrat who retired at the start of the year, declined to comment on the ruling, saying attorneys advised him not to comment as the case may continue.
Boquist said he hopes the case’s outcome will benefit all Oregonians and preserve their right to speak freely.
“When someone like me says something that the Democrats in power don’t like, or an enthusiastic moment is used as an opportunity to push their agenda, free speech must be protected,” Boquist said.
For nearly three years, Boquist represented himself in court against state attorneys assigned to defend the case. Initially, defendants won a motion to get the case dismissed. But Boquist successfully appealed the ruling on First Amendment grounds and the lawsuit stayed alive.
In an interview, Boquist said the experience was enlightening.
“It’s the damn paperwork,” he said when asked about the biggest challenge. “It’s not preparing the case. It’s not pleading the case. It’s not finding the facts. It’s just you have all these paperwork, hurdles and formats you’ve got to go through.”
Eventually, Boquist hired former Marion County judge Vance Day and Salem attorney Beth Jones to represent him in court in June 2022.
Capitol security never increased in anticipation of Boquist’s arrival, McShane noted in his ruling.
“This entire process appears to be a publicity stunt by a committee with no authorization seeking to impose a sanction against a member that it never intended to enforce,” he wrote.
Boquist left the Republican Party in 2021 and is a registered Independent. He joined Senate Republicans in their six-week walkout in this year’s legislative session, running afoul of a voter-approved constitutional amendment that aims to block lawmakers with 10 or more unexcused absences from running for re-election. He intends to challenge that new law and seek re-election in 2024.
It’s unclear if the defendants will appeal the case. Manning couldn’t be reached for comment.
“free speech must be protected” even if you don’t like it. Lincoln County lost a First Amendment case 10 years ago.